Political Ravings Forum - Politics Forum » Political News - Politics In The News » World News & Politics » Muslim Ideology.....sick!

World News & Politics Discuss world news and international politics here. Please keep this forum focused on WORLD news and politics, not focused on America!

Political Ravings Forum - A Forum For Political Junkies
Sponsored Links

Reply
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Muslim Ideology.....sick!
  #11  
Old 11.29.2007
TheKing's Avatar
Political Forum Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 184
Last Seen: 03.12.2008
This is what I find funny about liberals. They look at a perversion like Islam and still attack Christianty. That's just proves that their agenda has no logic, it's simply about hate of Christanity. They think that Christmas trees is a bigger threat to humanity, than the lashing of 19 year old rape victim. They think that a person having a different opininon about birth control is more of a serious threat, then Muslims blowing up school childern. They simply choose to ignore, and even excuse Islam in everyway, but Christianity should be defeated. This mentality just doesn't make since to me.

Who are we to judge? Interesting. Who are we to judge secregation, slavery, communisism, or any other perversion. This is another example of "progressive thinking". The idea of progressive thinking in the hands of liberals is about oppressing the truths, while promoting their agenda. They convince people that's it's socially unacceptable to have a dissenting voice of their agenda. This is what some call social engineering, and these concepts are being indoctrinated at very young ages.
Reply With Quote
Remove This Ad By Registering. Join Our Political Forum For Free. Sponsored Links:

  #12  
Old 11.29.2007
Political Forum Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 153
Last Seen: 06.18.2008
Well you bring up a good point...why don't more moderate Christians speak out about the hijacking of their religion by Dominionists...they have a very negative agenda.

KJ
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 11.29.2007
Smurf-316's Avatar
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Asheboro N.C.
Age: 37
Posts: 812
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kalamity Jane View Post
Well you bring up a good point...why don't more moderate Christians speak out about the hijacking of their religion by Dominionists...they have a very negative agenda.

KJ
sorry KJ i'm stupid here.
can you define what you mean by 'Dominionists' ?
__________________
Politics
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 11.29.2007
Political Forum Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 153
Last Seen: 06.18.2008
Quote:
Originally Posted by Smurf-316 View Post
sorry KJ i'm stupid here.
can you define what you mean by 'Dominionists' ?
Dominion Theology

[LINK POSTED BY MEMBER] Only Members Can View This Political Forum Link. is a grouping of theological systems[LINK POSTED BY MEMBER] Only Members Can View This Political Forum Link. with the common belief that society should be governed exclusively by the law of God as codified in the Bible, to the exclusion of secular law, a view also known as [LINK POSTED BY MEMBER] Only Members Can View This Political Forum Link. . The most prominent modern formulation of Dominion Theology is [LINK POSTED BY MEMBER] Only Members Can View This Political Forum Link. , founded by [LINK POSTED BY MEMBER] Only Members Can View This Political Forum Link. in the 1970s. Reconstructionists themselves use the word dominionism to refer to their belief that civil government should be controlled by Christians alone and conducted according to Biblical law.[LINK POSTED BY MEMBER] Only Members Can View This Political Forum Link. [LINK POSTED BY MEMBER] Only Members Can View This Political Forum Link. Social scientists have used the word "dominionism" to refer to adherence to Dominion Theology[LINK POSTED BY MEMBER] Only Members Can View This Political Forum Link. [LINK POSTED BY MEMBER] Only Members Can View This Political Forum Link. [LINK POSTED BY MEMBER] Only Members Can View This Political Forum Link. as well as to the influence in the broader [LINK POSTED BY MEMBER] Only Members Can View This Political Forum Link. of ideas inspired by Dominion Theology.[LINK POSTED BY MEMBER] Only Members Can View This Political Forum Link. Although such influence (particularly of Reconstructionism) has been described by many authors,[LINK POSTED BY MEMBER] Only Members Can View This Political Forum Link. [LINK POSTED BY MEMBER] Only Members Can View This Political Forum Link. full adherents to Reconstructionism are few and marginalized among conservative Christians.[LINK POSTED BY MEMBER] Only Members Can View This Political Forum Link. [LINK POSTED BY MEMBER] Only Members Can View This Political Forum Link. [LINK POSTED BY MEMBER] Only Members Can View This Political Forum Link.

[[LINK POSTED BY MEMBER] Only Members Can View This Political Forum Link. ] Dominionism as a broader movement

In the early 1990s, sociologist [LINK POSTED BY MEMBER] Only Members Can View This Political Forum Link. [LINK POSTED BY MEMBER] Only Members Can View This Political Forum Link. [LINK POSTED BY MEMBER] Only Members Can View This Political Forum Link. and journalist [LINK POSTED BY MEMBER] Only Members Can View This Political Forum Link. [LINK POSTED BY MEMBER] Only Members Can View This Political Forum Link. [LINK POSTED BY MEMBER] Only Members Can View This Political Forum Link. defined dominionism as a movement that, while including Dominion Theology and Reconstructionism as subsets, is much broader in scope, extending to much of the [LINK POSTED BY MEMBER] Only Members Can View This Political Forum Link. .[LINK POSTED BY MEMBER] Only Members Can View This Political Forum Link. In his 1992 study of Dominion Theology and its influence on the Christian Right, Bruce Barron writes,
In the context of American evangelical efforts to penetrate and transform public life, the distinguishing mark of a dominionist is a commitment to defining and carrying out an approach to building society that is self-consciously defined as exclusively Christian, and dependent specifically on the work of Christians, rather than based on a broader consensus.[LINK POSTED BY MEMBER] Only Members Can View This Political Forum Link. (p. 14, emphasis in original)
According to Diamond, the defining concept of dominionism is "that Christians alone are Biblically mandated to occupy all secular institutions until Christ returns". In 1989, Diamond declared that this concept "has become the central unifying ideology for the Christian Right"[LINK POSTED BY MEMBER] Only Members Can View This Political Forum Link. (p.138, emphasis in original). In 1995, she called it "prevalent on the Christian Right."[LINK POSTED BY MEMBER] Only Members Can View This Political Forum Link. Journalist [LINK POSTED BY MEMBER] Only Members Can View This Political Forum Link. added in 1998 that, although they represent different theological and political ideas, dominionists assert a Christian duty to take "control of a sinful secular society."[LINK POSTED BY MEMBER] Only Members Can View This Political Forum Link.
In 2005, Clarkson enumerated the following characteristics shared by all forms of dominionism:[LINK POSTED BY MEMBER] Only Members Can View This Political Forum Link.
1. Dominionists celebrate Christian nationalism, in that they believe that the United States once was, and should once again be, a Christian nation. In this way, they deny the Enlightenment roots of American democracy.
2. Dominionists promote religious supremacy, insofar as they generally do not respect the equality of other religions, or even other versions of Christianity.
3. Dominionists endorse theocratic visions, insofar as they believe that the Ten Commandments, or "biblical law," should be the foundation of American law, and that the U.S. Constitution should be seen as a vehicle for implementing Biblical principles.[LINK POSTED BY MEMBER] Only Members Can View This Political Forum Link.
Other authors who stress the influence of Dominionist ideas on the Christian Right include [LINK POSTED BY MEMBER] Only Members Can View This Political Forum Link. [LINK POSTED BY MEMBER] Only Members Can View This Political Forum Link. and [LINK POSTED BY MEMBER] Only Members Can View This Political Forum Link. [LINK POSTED BY MEMBER] Only Members Can View This Political Forum Link. [LINK POSTED BY MEMBER] Only Members Can View This Political Forum Link.
Journalist [LINK POSTED BY MEMBER] Only Members Can View This Political Forum Link. began using the term dominionism in his articles in 2004,[LINK POSTED BY MEMBER] Only Members Can View This Political Forum Link. [LINK POSTED BY MEMBER] Only Members Can View This Political Forum Link. [LINK POSTED BY MEMBER] Only Members Can View This Political Forum Link. and has been followed in this usage by authors including Katherine Yurica,[LINK POSTED BY MEMBER] Only Members Can View This Political Forum Link. [LINK POSTED BY MEMBER] Only Members Can View This Political Forum Link. [LINK POSTED BY MEMBER] Only Members Can View This Political Forum Link. Marion Maddox,[LINK POSTED BY MEMBER] Only Members Can View This Political Forum Link. James Rudin,[LINK POSTED BY MEMBER] Only Members Can View This Political Forum Link. [LINK POSTED BY MEMBER] Only Members Can View This Political Forum Link. ,[LINK POSTED BY MEMBER] Only Members Can View This Political Forum Link. and the advocacy group [LINK POSTED BY MEMBER] Only Members Can View This Political Forum Link. .[LINK POSTED BY MEMBER] Only Members Can View This Political Forum Link. This group of authors has applied the term to a broader spectrum of people than have Diamond, Clarkson, and Berlet.

[LINK POSTED BY MEMBER] Only Members Can View This Political Forum Link.

Here is a link to a lot of different information on Dominionist thinking.




[LINK POSTED BY MEMBER] Only Members Can View This Political Forum Link.



They are very busy taking over moderate churches and radicalizing them....



KJ

Last edited by Kalamity Jane; 11.29.2007 at 10.14 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 11.29.2007
TheKing's Avatar
Political Forum Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 184
Last Seen: 03.12.2008
You people want to wave this flag on every issue and it doesn't have any creditability. It's not real, it's not happening.

Do I think there are people in this country that would love to have nothing but a christian government, yes. But there are also people in this country that would love to have a muslim United States, a Buddist United States, an Athiest United States, and so far the atheist are winning.

The chrisitan threat is not a threat at all, in fact I dare say the more you attack it, the more you try to alienate this country from the foundation it was developed on, and yes it had everything to do with GOD, then we risk losing it all.

Just like in the other thread, why are we losing our moral fabric? What is family values. Anymore it is hard question to ask. Look at where we are at in this country, we're at a crossroads. We can continue on this path of self destruction, or we can rewind, and try remember what made this country great at one time, and it had nothing to do with this mentality of EVIL CHRISTIANS trying to dominate everyone.

As far as taking over churchs, I don't know when, if ever you been church, but I can tell that this concept of the strict right wing taking over churchs is a myth, if not just misleading. If anything, churchs are radically moving away from the basics of GOD and Chrisitianity for the benefit of getting the more "main stream" people in the church. It's not about God anymore at a lot of these churchs, it's about being the biggest and the most popular church in town. It's about the sunday morning chrisitan making their presence know for the community. I know these people, I know what I'm talking about.

I was raised in a small peneticostal church in a small town. That type of church doesn't exist anymore. People don't want to feel the guilt when going to church, they don't want to hear the word of God. They want to come to be entertained. They want the pastor to tell them everything is ok.

Last edited by TheKing; 11.29.2007 at 10.30 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 11.29.2007
Political Forum Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 153
Last Seen: 06.18.2008
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheKing View Post
You people want to wave this flag on every issue and it doesn't have any creditability. It's not real, it's not happening. Why do you begin every post or statement with "You People"? This is very well documented...you are not paying attention.

Do I think there are people in this country that would love to have nothing but a christian government, yes. But there are also people in this country that would love to have a muslim United States, a Buddist United States, an Athiest United States, and so far the atheist are winning. Up until recently (the last 7 years and the 'faith based initiative' the Constitution was winning...we have a secular government, as was intended...at least we used to.

The chrisitan threat is not a threat at all, in fact I dare say the more you attack it, the more you try to alienate this country from the foundation it was developed on, and yes it had everything to do with GOD, then we risk losing it all. See...many people who follow Rushdoony and his beliefs don't even know it...but they share the beliefs...most people in power don't mention Rushdoony or his books....but they follow the teachings. This is one of them....and it is false.

Just like in the other thread, why are we losing our moral fabric? What is family values. Anymore it is hard question to ask. Look at where we are at in this country, we're at a crossroads. We can continue on this path of self destruction, or we can rewind, and try remember what made this country great at one time, and it had nothing to do with this mentality of EVIL CHRISTIANS trying to dominate everyone.
I didn't say anything of evil christians....but I do look at policy and who drives the policy and what the results of the policy are...I'm still waiting for you to tell me what you mean by 'family values'.

As far as taking over churchs, I don't know when, if ever you been church, but I can tell that this concept of the strict right wing taking over churchs is a myth, if not just misleading. If anything, churchs are radically moving away from the basics of GOD and Chrisitianity for the benefit of getting the more "main stream" people in the church. It's not about God anymore at a lot of these churchs, it's about being the biggest and the most popular church in town. It's about the sunday morning chrisitan making their presence know for the community. I know these people, I know what I'm talking about. I believe it's most obvious with the Southern Baptist Convention... The "[LINK POSTED BY MEMBER] Only Members Can View This Political Forum Link. "—by far its most notable disagreement.[LINK POSTED BY MEMBER] Only Members Can View This Political Forum Link. The well-orchestrated takeover has been described by one Baptist leader[LINK POSTED BY MEMBER] Only Members Can View This Political Forum Link. as having fragmented Southern Baptist fellowship and as being "far more serious than a controversy." The leader wrote that "it was a self-destructive, contentious, one-sided feud that at times took on combative characteristics." Southern Baptists are now polarized into two major groups—moderates and conservatives. All of the leaders of Southern Baptist agencies prior to 1979 have been replaced with fundamentalist leaders.[LINK POSTED BY MEMBER] Only Members Can View This Political Forum Link.

[LINK POSTED BY MEMBER] Only Members Can View This Political Forum Link.

This is just one example...and it has caused many problems among Baptists with churches leaving, other denominations are having similar problems...including the Catholic Church...but thankfully moderate Christians are starting to speak up and organize against these radical right wing, dominionist inspired, cults. ]

Look at these huge churches with 'prosperity theology' etc...what a crock, and another example.

It isn't made up, it isn't false, this has been happening for decades, but no one noticed...or if they did, no one spoke up.

I was raised in a small peneticostal church in a small town. That type of church doesn't exist anymore. People don't want to feel the guilt when going to church, they don't want to hear the word of God. They want to come to be entertained. They want the pastor to tell them everything is ok.
Well from what I've read even the 4 square Church has fallen under the spell of this non-sense.

KJ
Reply With Quote
Remove This Ad By Registering. Join Our Political Forum For Free. Sponsored Links:

  #17  
Old 11.29.2007
TheKing's Avatar
Political Forum Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 184
Last Seen: 03.12.2008
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kalamity Jane View Post
Well from what I've read even the 4 square Church has fallen under the spell of this non-sense.

KJ
You also have a well documented history of believing anything anti-American, lol, even the most wildest conspriacies. lol That doesn't make you a bad person, just simple minded.


I should have known that you would limit your view to the anti-chrisitan moment. That's a big motivation in a lot of your posts. I guess the thing is, America might make it through this period of "progressive ideology". I'm seeing a movement going away from this perversion. People are starting to understand what is happening. I believe your one of the most delibertly misinformed people I have ever met. I'm not sure you will survive the transition back to morality, lol.


What's are family values to me? I guess it's eaiser to say what it isn't.

Most of your veiws are not family values.

I don't think schools should pass out condoms to 11 year olds. I don't think homosexuality should be addressed in any public school, I don't think minors should be able to get abortions without a parents consent, I think Hollywood and TV should be more responsible on what they provide and who they target to. I don't think Christmas trees is a danger to diversity. I think Christianity should be respected the same as any other religion. I do believe BJ's is sex. I don't believe the word marriage should be redinfined to pander to queers that won't respect anyone else's beliefs. I thihnk parents shoud be the parents, not friends. I think parents should be held more responsible for their childern. I think the N-word shouldn't be accepted if used by a black or a white person. I think the word stereotype, bigot, racist and hero is used to often and in the wrong context.

What is family values, I'm not surprised you don't know KJ.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 11.29.2007
Political Forum Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 153
Last Seen: 06.18.2008
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheKing View Post
You also have a well documented history of believing anything anti-American, lol, even the most wildest conspriacies. lol That doesn't make you a bad person, just simple minded. I feel the same about you...LOL


I should have known that you would limit your view to the anti-chrisitan moment. That's a big motivation in a lot of your posts. I guess the thing is, America might make it through this period of "progressive ideology". I'm seeing a movement going away from this perversion. People are starting to understand what is happening. I believe your one of the most delibertly misinformed people I have ever met. I'm not sure you will survive the transition back to morality, lol. It isn't a motivation, it is an observation of what is happening in our country. There are many moderate Christians that agree and are doing what they need to protect themselves against the cultish radical right...that's a fact jack. This isn't 'progressive ideology' it's coming straight from the right and neo conservatives...as far as being misinformed I think not...you are part of the 23% committed, no matter what, a true follower, you will not see, your view people that through thought, and education, change their position on an issue as flip flopper's, people to be scorned, so you will avoid seriously looking at anything contrary to your view, even to move to a live and let live position, that's why your radical ...I think your last line brings me back to my original questions about what you mean by 'family values' and how that would play out by your world view...you will never answer me, just as I expected.


What's are family values to me? I guess it's eaiser to say what it isn't.

Most of your veiws are not family values.

I don't think schools should pass out condoms to 11 year olds. I don't think homosexuality should be addressed in any public school, I don't think minors should be able to get abortions without a parents consent, I think Hollywood and TV should be more responsible on what they provide and who they target to. I don't think Christmas trees is a danger to diversity. I think Christianity should be respected the same as any other religion. I do believe BJ's is sex. I don't believe the word marriage should be redinfined to pander to queers that won't respect anyone else's beliefs. I thihnk parents shoud be the parents, not friends. I think parents should be held more responsible for their childern. I think the N-word shouldn't be accepted if used by a black or a white person. I think the word stereotype, bigot, racist and hero is used to often and in the wrong context.

What is family values, I'm not surprised you don't know KJ.
You yourself don't know what 'family values' is...only what you think it isn't. etc. I didn't ask because I don't know, I want to know if there is anything beyond the talking point...some kind of sincere understanding. I also want to know if you have any idea what your Christian dominated America would look like, what kinds of laws would be in place etc.

Typical.

KJ
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 11.29.2007
TheKing's Avatar
Political Forum Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 184
Last Seen: 03.12.2008
I beleive you and Dsolo are the bigots. Because if you notice, I'm not saying you don't have a right to feel the way you feel. I'm the one promoting live and let live. It's actually people like you and Dsolo that's telling everyone else we can't have the opininons we have, we can't believe in what we believe. It's you Jane that is threatening my freedom of free speech and opininon.

You people try to past yourselves off as great communicators of diversity. But then you play judge on what is protected as diversity. Christians have a right to be who they are, and to be protected as much as any one else. Even if their are not cosidered "moderate" enough by people like you.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 11.29.2007
Political Forum Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 153
Last Seen: 06.18.2008
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheKing View Post
I beleive you and Dsolo are the bigots. Because if you notice, I'm not saying you don't have a right to feel the way you feel. I'm the one promoting live and let live. It's actually people like you and Dsolo that's telling everyone else we can't have the opininons we have, we can't believe in what we believe. It's you Jane that is threatening my freedom of free speech and opininon. Once again we disagree King, I am not interested in writing laws that would curtail your choices in your life, you however are interested in limiting my choices...your opinions are yours and mine are mine...will I try to stop you from having full citizenship because of what you believe, no...but you will move to put something in place to prevent others from having full rights because they are different from you.

You people try to past yourselves off as great communicators of diversity. But then you play judge on what is protected as diversity. Christians have a right to be who they are, and to be protected as much as any one else. Even if their are not cosidered "moderate" enough by people like you.
What you fail to understand or accept is that you want to impose your beliefs, you try to justify these desires by claiming we have a Christian nation, denying diversity, etc. etc. and trying to pass laws to enforce your 'world view'...

What am I stopping you from doing as a Christian? How are you under attack...because you don't garner the 'respect' you think your due....all I can say is when you can talk to someone without being dismissive and demeaning, projecting your moralistic views on them, stop trying to hijack history and science to promote your views... then my guess is that Religion will again be respected...not agreed with but not outed for what the right wing has made it into, a political party....that should be taxed.

Just my view...

KJ
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Political Forum Replies Last Post
The Muslim World View Smurf-316 World News & Politics 0 11.27.2007 09.05 PM
Empire State Bldg To Go Green To Celebrate Muslim Holiday? WiseOne Politics In The News 18 10.18.2007 05.21 PM
SICK Of The News! WiseOne Politics In The News 10 09.19.2007 02.10 PM
This makes me sick... Mastertech Politics In The News 2 09.11.2007 04.35 AM


vBulletin Forum Software, Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.

© Political Forum - Politics Forum For Political Ravings -Forget Politically Correct!

vBulletin Skin by CompletevB
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO



Political Forum Disclaimer: All content, information and opinions (collectively, the "Material") presented on Our Political Discussion Board at PoliticalRavings.com are those of the authors of posts and messages (collectively, the "participants") and not Political Ravings. Political Ravings does not guarantee the reliability, completeness, accuracy, timeliness or up-to-date-ness of the material presented on our Political Forum. The material is published "as is," and does not represent the official views and opinions of Political Ravings or any company. Any reliance upon the Material presented on these forums shall be at User's own risk. Political Ravings does not review the substance of the content posted by users on these forums and is therefore not responsible for any of such content. Political Ravings Forum merely provides a space for its users to express and exchange their own opinions.