Reform US Government


Political Ravings Forum - Politics Forum » Other Topics - Society, Culture, Off-Topic » Everything Else » Wal-Mart SHIP FROM CHINA...

Everything Else Talk about whatever is on your mind here that dosn't fit in other forums or might not be directly related to politics.

Political Ravings Forum - A Forum For Political Junkies
Sponsored Links

Reply
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Wal-Mart SHIP FROM CHINA...
  #1  
Old 03.25.2008
jamwadmag's Avatar
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Not Here
Posts: 361
Bell Wal-Mart SHIP FROM CHINA...

What a ship....no wonder "made in China" is displacing North American goods bigtime with this floating continent transporting the goods in 4 days no less!!!

Politics

Politics

Politics


That is some huge ship - and 31 knots. Wal-Mart & China will be the death of The North American Manufacturing Companies.


This is how Wal-Mart gets all its stuff from China:

15,000 containers and a 207' beam! And look at the crew-size for a ship

Longer than a US aircraft carrier which has a complement of 5,000 men and
Officers.

Think it's big enough? Notice that 207' beam means it was NOT designed for
The Panama or Suez Canal . It is strictly transpacific. Check out the
Cruise speed: 31 knots means the goods arrive 4 days before the typical
Container ship (18-20 knots) on a China-to-California run.
So this
Behemoth is hugely competitive carrying perishable goods.

This ship was built in three, or perhaps as many as five sections. The

Sections floated together and then were welded. The ship is named

Emma Maersk. The command bridge is higher than a 10-story building

And has 11 crane rigs that can operate simultaneously.


Additional info:

Country of origin - Denmark
Length - 1,302 ft
Width - 207 ft
Net cargo - 123,200 tons
Engine - 14 in-line cylinders diesel engine (110,000 BHP) Cruise Speed - 31
Knots, Cargo capacity - 15,000 TEU (1 TEU = 20 ft3 container)
Crew - 13 people First Trip - Sept. 08, 2006 Construction cost - US
$145,000,000+
Silicone painting applied to the ship bottom reduces water resistance and
Saves 317,000 gallons of diesel per year

EDITORS COMMENT: The Port of L.A. has been expecting (and 'anticipating') these giant ships and has dredged out it's entry channels for the bigger/deeper draft super-ships!!
Reply With Quote
Remove This Ad By Registering. Join Our Political Forum For Free. Sponsored Links:

  #2  
Old 03.25.2008
politicallymoderate's Avatar
Political Forum Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 103
Last Seen: 07.17.2008
WOW!!!!! look at the yarddogs with trailers next to it. thats a monster for sure.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04.16.2009
WiseOne's Avatar
Political Forum Owner
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Big Sandy, TN
Posts: 1,164
Last Seen: 4 Days Ago
Persuasion? Independent
Political Blog: 1
Water Cold1

HOLY CRAP! I bet they wish they wouldn't have made it that big right now, LOL.
__________________


Reform Government
...take that $13 bucks and shove it up their butts!


Hillary For President
...do YOU want Hillary For President?


Truck Forum
...making sense of the trucking industry


...I know not with what weapons World War III will be fought, but World War IV will be fought with sticks and stones. -- Albert Einstein




________________________________________
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 04.17.2009
Daisy Duke's Avatar
Political Forum Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Age: 53
Posts: 112
Last Seen: 4 Days Ago
Persuasion? Conservative Party
USA

holy cow! I try hard to buy American but that is almost imposiable.....no more than wht I would buy in a year it would not fill up one container.....and think them containers float in there alll the time.....
__________________

LET FREEDOM RING
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 09.27.2009
Political Forum Newbie
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Possum Hollow, USA
Age: 63
Posts: 2
Last Seen: 09.27.2009
Persuasion? Other
sumthig you may not know...15 of the world's biggest ships may now emit as much pollution as all the world's 760m cars....


oh! and lets not forget tat the American taxpayers are paying over $9 billion in hidden taxes to clean the fish from ballast tanks of these ships.

And the funny part is tat the turnips in D. C. want you and I to go green on our tax dollar....do you think tat if the world tax those ships up their ### like the turnips in D. C. have done to the American people...tat all those so-call cheap items would be cheap...i think not.
Reply With Quote
Remove This Ad By Registering. Join Our Political Forum For Free. Sponsored Links:

  #6  
Old 09.27.2009
Political Forum Newbie
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Possum Hollow, USA
Age: 63
Posts: 2
Last Seen: 09.27.2009
Persuasion? Other
oops! here is tat link...


[LINK POSTED BY MEMBER] Only Members Can View This Political Forum Link.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 12.29.2009
Political Forum Newbie
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 2
Last Seen: 12.29.2009
Persuasion? Independent
Busted

Something sounds fishy here... So I started googling around...

Emma is an impressive ship.

I think 4 days to China is way to fast.
The MAX. ship speed of Emma is listed elsewhere at 25 knots or in excess of. Avg speed in transit would NOT be the top speed.

25 knots = 28.7 mph
31 knots = 35.6 mph

Assuming 24 hours in a day, moving 35.6 MPH every second of travel = 3,417.6 miles distance travelled.

Yokohama, Japan (Toyko Bay, NOT China, which is further east) to San Francisco is 4,536 miles according to a National Geographic map, so in 4 days of perfect sailing conditions, Emma is still at sea.

At 25 knots max as listed in specifications, that's 2,755 miles
and at a more leisurely, fuel efficient, and realistic AVG speed of 18 knots over 96 hours that's 1,728 miles, not even to Hawaii (coming from the far east).
(speaking of fuel, Emma controversially burns bunker fuel which is nearly the inverse of being "green". )

To travel 4536 miles in 96 hours, Emma would need to have and AVERAGE Speed of 47.3 MPH. That's full throttle for a lot of bowriders.
BUSTED!

Also, I don't see any cranes ON the deck of Emma, those cranes in the photo are attached to the sea wall of the port. It's common for container ships to rely on port based cranes for loading.

Owned by Danish, Emma is not owned by Wal-Mart so I think it's safe to assume that goods in the containers are bound for many places other than "Wal-Mart" and while we do have a trade deficit, I'm sure we frequently ship things back to China. (mostly crap we don't want, like plastic scrap, waste paper, waste electronics, scrap metal...) In 2006, the BBC reported that it's main route would be to Europe.

The basic errors of the original post in this forum is an example of why we need MORE science and math teaching in school and less reliance on Fox News.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 12.29.2009
Political Forum Newbie
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 2
Last Seen: 12.29.2009
Persuasion? Independent
Another link showing speed and discussing emissions.

[LINK POSTED BY MEMBER] Only Members Can View This Political Forum Link.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
china ship, ship from china, wal-mart ship

Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Political Forum Replies Last Post
China Again Warns Taiwan On Independence WiseOne World News & Politics 0 03.04.2008 06.24 AM
US Anti-Missle Ship Docks In Israel WiseOne World News & Politics 0 02.04.2008 06.57 PM
Iran Buys Jets From China With Israeli Technology WiseOne World News & Politics 1 10.24.2007 08.15 AM
China Promotes Military Officers Who Know Taiwanese Affairs WiseOne World News & Politics 0 10.09.2007 06.00 PM



vBulletin Forum Software, Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.

© Political Forum - Politics Forum For Political Ravings -Forget Politically Correct!

vBulletin Skin by CompletevB
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO



Political Forum Disclaimer: All content, information and opinions (collectively, the "Material") presented on Our Political Discussion Board at PoliticalRavings.com are those of the authors of posts and messages (collectively, the "participants") and not Political Ravings. Political Ravings does not guarantee the reliability, completeness, accuracy, timeliness or up-to-date-ness of the material presented on our Political Forum. The material is published "as is," and does not represent the official views and opinions of Political Ravings or any company. Any reliance upon the Material presented on these forums shall be at User's own risk. Political Ravings does not review the substance of the content posted by users on these forums and is therefore not responsible for any of such content. Political Ravings Forum merely provides a space for its users to express and exchange their own opinions. Privacy: Google, as a third party vendor, uses cookies to serve ads on this site. Google's use of the DART cookie enables it to serve ads based on your visit to this site and other sites on the Internet. Users may opt out of the use of the DART cookie by visiting the Google ad and content network privacy policy.