The Tasks Before Us in the Post-Cheney Era: Lyndon LaRouche - Political Ravings Forum

freightmaster · #1 01.05.2008

So this is the kind of world we've been living in. It was intentionally created. The intention was, to eliminate the United States. Because as long as the United States existed in the constitutional form that Roosevelt represented, fascism could not come back in the world. And finance capital could not become a predator, to eat the world. So the goal was, get Franklin Roosevelt out of the Americans. Destroy the American system. Destroy the American agro-industrial system. President Kennedy was killed, and the program went into full swing. Eisenhower had warned against it, but it went into full swing. So, from the time we went into the Indo-China war, we were headed toward our own self-destruction.
Our adversary was not the Soviet Union. We had an adversary in the Soviet Union, but that was secondary. Our adversary was closer to home, in our own financial system, in our own banking and financial system. They wanted to destroy us.
Look at the effect! Did they destroy us? Look at the standard of living in the lower 80% of our family income brackets, since 1977. There has been a consistent decline. Look at the pattern of our states. Look at the state of Michigan! Look at the state of Ohio! Look at western Pennsylvania. Look at states across the country, especially the northern belt. Look at the grain belt. We have been destroyed!
How? By policy. It has been the policy to destroy us. It has been the policy to uproot the United States for once and for all, for what it represents. This is the enemy! This is the real enemy!

[LINK POSTED BY MEMBER] Only Members Can View This Political Forum Link.

[LINK POSTED BY MEMBER] Only Members Can View This Political Forum Link.

Some spare time on your hands? This needs to be seen and read!

Kalamity Jane · #2 01.05.2008

There is a lot of truth in this. Which party has been so busy dismantling Roosevelt's legacy? Why have liberals and progressives been reviled? Venom from the hard right...and greed. I guess we have what we voted for don't we?

KJ

freightmaster · #3 01.05.2008

Yes we do kalamity, America has a small window of opportunity left to do the right thing.If another member of the CFR,trilateral commission or scull and bones type gets SELECTED,this country deserves what it gets.

BIGJ · #4 01.05.2008

Quote:

Originally Posted by freightmaster

Yes we do kalamity, America has a small window of opportunity left to do the right thing.If another member of the CFR,trilateral commission or scull and bones type gets SELECTED,this country deserves what it gets.

Freight, while there are SOME truth in your words. Not everyone is an enemy of you or the American people. You know who is the enemy? People like Jonathan Hoenig, Brittany Spears, Hollywood, The media, Wall Street, Neo-Confederates, and people who want to break this country up because voters reject loony policies.

Lyndon LaRoaude is one of those who make up these crazy loony policies.

Kalamity Jane · #5 01.06.2008

There was a corporate coop attempt during Roosevelt's presidency...a true patriot stood between our County and the perpetrators...G.W.Bush's family was part of the coop...they won't go away, they won't stop...and you can call anyone who has the ability to see past the propaganda a conspiracy theorist but it doesn't change the fact that our enemy lies within..it is us.

KJ

freightmaster · #6 01.07.2008

Quote:

Originally Posted by BIGJ

Freight, while there are SOME truth in your words. Not everyone is an enemy of you or the American people. You know who is the enemy? People like Jonathan Hoenig, Brittany Spears, Hollywood, The media, Wall Street, Neo-Confederates, and people who want to break this country up because voters reject loony policies.

Lyndon LaRoaude is one of those who make up these crazy loony policies.

The simple fact that Prescott Bush, George HW Bush's father and father in law George Herbert Walker, were proven and documented supporter's of HITLER and the NAZI party is not relevant to you?

[LINK POSTED BY MEMBER] Only Members Can View This Political Forum Link.

[LINK POSTED BY MEMBER] Only Members Can View This Political Forum Link.

And I believe you should have said Neo Conservative instead of Neo Confederate !
The term neo-Confederate describes a political and/or cultural movement based mainly in the [LINK POSTED BY MEMBER] Only Members Can View This Political Forum Link. that is characterized by a celebration of the history of the [LINK POSTED BY MEMBER] Only Members Can View This Political Forum Link. (CSA) and support for the CSA's aims. Neo-Confederate issues may include [LINK POSTED BY MEMBER] Only Members Can View This Political Forum Link. , such as [LINK POSTED BY MEMBER] Only Members Can View This Political Forum Link. (in which state laws override federal laws), and a pro-Confederate view of history, particularly regarding the [LINK POSTED BY MEMBER] Only Members Can View This Political Forum Link. and the role of slavery in that war. Some groups in the movement support full future [LINK POSTED BY MEMBER] Only Members Can View This Political Forum Link. , while others focus on preserving their image of southern heritage. The term "neo-Confederate" is considered by many people a pejorative [LINK POSTED BY MEMBER] Only Members Can View This Political Forum Link. and its application to specific groups and individuals has caused controversy.
A group that is frequently labeled as being "neo-Confederate" is the [LINK POSTED BY MEMBER] Only Members Can View This Political Forum Link. (LS), which does advocate future [LINK POSTED BY MEMBER] Only Members Can View This Political Forum Link. . It declares that it seeks the "well-being and independence of the Southern people." [LINK POSTED BY MEMBER] Only Members Can View This Political Forum Link. A number of small political parties also call for secession, including the [LINK POSTED BY MEMBER] Only Members Can View This Political Forum Link. and its offshoot, the [LINK POSTED BY MEMBER] Only Members Can View This Political Forum Link. .

Here's your neo cons for you!!!!!!!
"Bush Doctrine"

The [LINK POSTED BY MEMBER] Only Members Can View This Political Forum Link. of preemptive war was explicitely stated in the [LINK POSTED BY MEMBER] Only Members Can View This Political Forum Link. text entitled the National Security Strategy of the United States published on [LINK POSTED BY MEMBER] Only Members Can View This Political Forum Link. , [LINK POSTED BY MEMBER] Only Members Can View This Political Forum Link. . "We must deter and defend against the threat before it is unleashed. ... even if uncertainty remains as to the time and place of the enemy’s attack. ... The United States will, if necessary, act preemptively."[LINK POSTED BY MEMBER] Only Members Can View This Political Forum Link. Policy analysts noted that the [LINK POSTED BY MEMBER] Only Members Can View This Political Forum Link. as stated in the 2002 NSS document bore a strong resemblance to recommendations originally presented in a controversial Defense Planning Guidance draft written in 1992 by [LINK POSTED BY MEMBER] Only Members Can View This Political Forum Link. under the first Bush administration.[LINK POSTED BY MEMBER] Only Members Can View This Political Forum Link.
The Bush Doctrine was greeted with accolades by many neoconservatives. When asked whether he agreed with the Bush Doctrine, [LINK POSTED BY MEMBER] Only Members Can View This Political Forum Link. said he did, and that "I think [Bush is] exactly right to say we can’t sit back and wait for the next terrorist strike on Manhattan. We have to go out and stop the terrorists overseas. We have to play the role of the global policeman.... But I also argue that we ought to go further."[LINK POSTED BY MEMBER] Only Members Can View This Political Forum Link. Discussing the significance of the Bush Doctrine, neoconservative writer [LINK POSTED BY MEMBER] Only Members Can View This Political Forum Link. claimed: "The world is a mess. And, I think, it's very much to Bush's credit that he's gotten serious about dealing with it.... The danger is not that we're going to do too much. The danger is that we're going to do too little."[LINK POSTED BY MEMBER] Only Members Can View This Political Forum Link.

Brickman · #7 01.07.2008

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kalamity Jane

I guess we have what we voted for don't we?

KJ

A post of KJ's I can finally agree with. Michigan is a fine upstanding example of what happens when Democrats are given free reign to run a state into the ground.

MI has been under Dem control for a very long time and look at the fine economical mess we have there.

Folks this is proof that you cannot tax your way to prosperity, and yet the first order of business for the Dems is promising to raise taxes.

Regardless of which political party is in control we need to get back to the constitution, and politicians need to pull their collective heads out and go to work for the good of the people. Not the select few that think they were voted in to control their own personal welfare and damn those that voted them in. WE NEED TERM LIMITS.

freightmaster · #8 01.07.2008

Ron Paul is the only one running that practices what he preaches...i.e. following the constitution.

BIGJ · #9 01.10.2008

Quote:

Originally Posted by freightmaster

The simple fact that Prescott Bush, George HW Bush's father and father in law George Herbert Walker, were proven and documented supporter's of HITLER and the NAZI party is not relevant to you?

[LINK POSTED BY MEMBER] Only Members Can View This Political Forum Link.

[LINK POSTED BY MEMBER] Only Members Can View This Political Forum Link.

And I believe you should have said Neo Conservative instead of Neo Confederate !
The term neo-Confederate describes a political and/or cultural movement based mainly in the [LINK POSTED BY MEMBER] Only Members Can View This Political Forum Link. that is characterized by a celebration of the history of the [LINK POSTED BY MEMBER] Only Members Can View This Political Forum Link. (CSA) and support for the CSA's aims. Neo-Confederate issues may include [LINK POSTED BY MEMBER] Only Members Can View This Political Forum Link. , such as [LINK POSTED BY MEMBER] Only Members Can View This Political Forum Link. (in which state laws override federal laws), and a pro-Confederate view of history, particularly regarding the [LINK POSTED BY MEMBER] Only Members Can View This Political Forum Link. and the role of slavery in that war. Some groups in the movement support full future [LINK POSTED BY MEMBER] Only Members Can View This Political Forum Link. , while others focus on preserving their image of southern heritage. The term "neo-Confederate" is considered by many people a pejorative [LINK POSTED BY MEMBER] Only Members Can View This Political Forum Link. and its application to specific groups and individuals has caused controversy.
A group that is frequently labeled as being "neo-Confederate" is the [LINK POSTED BY MEMBER] Only Members Can View This Political Forum Link. (LS), which does advocate future [LINK POSTED BY MEMBER] Only Members Can View This Political Forum Link. . It declares that it seeks the "well-being and independence of the Southern people." [LINK POSTED BY MEMBER] Only Members Can View This Political Forum Link. A number of small political parties also call for secession, including the [LINK POSTED BY MEMBER] Only Members Can View This Political Forum Link. and its offshoot, the [LINK POSTED BY MEMBER] Only Members Can View This Political Forum Link. .

Here's your neo cons for you!!!!!!!
"Bush Doctrine"

The [LINK POSTED BY MEMBER] Only Members Can View This Political Forum Link. of preemptive war was explicitely stated in the [LINK POSTED BY MEMBER] Only Members Can View This Political Forum Link. text entitled the National Security Strategy of the United States published on [LINK POSTED BY MEMBER] Only Members Can View This Political Forum Link. , [LINK POSTED BY MEMBER] Only Members Can View This Political Forum Link. . "We must deter and defend against the threat before it is unleashed. ... even if uncertainty remains as to the time and place of the enemy’s attack. ... The United States will, if necessary, act preemptively."[LINK POSTED BY MEMBER] Only Members Can View This Political Forum Link. Policy analysts noted that the [LINK POSTED BY MEMBER] Only Members Can View This Political Forum Link. as stated in the 2002 NSS document bore a strong resemblance to recommendations originally presented in a controversial Defense Planning Guidance draft written in 1992 by [LINK POSTED BY MEMBER] Only Members Can View This Political Forum Link. under the first Bush administration.[LINK POSTED BY MEMBER] Only Members Can View This Political Forum Link.
The Bush Doctrine was greeted with accolades by many neoconservatives. When asked whether he agreed with the Bush Doctrine, [LINK POSTED BY MEMBER] Only Members Can View This Political Forum Link. said he did, and that "I think [Bush is] exactly right to say we can’t sit back and wait for the next terrorist strike on Manhattan. We have to go out and stop the terrorists overseas. We have to play the role of the global policeman.... But I also argue that we ought to go further."[LINK POSTED BY MEMBER] Only Members Can View This Political Forum Link. Discussing the significance of the Bush Doctrine, neoconservative writer [LINK POSTED BY MEMBER] Only Members Can View This Political Forum Link. claimed: "The world is a mess. And, I think, it's very much to Bush's credit that he's gotten serious about dealing with it.... The danger is not that we're going to do too much. The danger is that we're going to do too little."[LINK POSTED BY MEMBER] Only Members Can View This Political Forum Link.

I am not dumb freightmaster. I know you wish I am dumb, but you are sadly mistaken. I do know ALL about the Bush family, Nixon, and the aftermath. This is why I am angry as hell. Not only at the Bush White House and the conseravtives, but those conspritory theoist who would make up stories in order to increase their ego. JUST LIKE you are doing now, mr Jeff Davis. I am an American citizen and I love this nation, I will not try to spilt this nation up because the majority are NOT agreeing with me or not intune.

George Bush presidency gave me a reason to be pissed off but it was the Barack Obama candidacy that gives me a reason to be hopeful. What do you frightmaster have to offer for this nation? Nothing, but spread half-truths and consrpisy theories. Me, I am in the planning and reserach in order to do something about it.

Lets get one thing clear, Freightmaster. Let me be clear to you. I hate neo-conservatives and neo-confederates. The neo-cons want war with other countries as so as the neoconfederates on eachother and minorites. You are no different.

I said what I said and I mean what said.

freightmaster · #10 01.11.2008

Quote:

Originally Posted by BIGJ

I am not dumb freightmaster. I know you wish I am dumb, but you are sadly mistaken. I do know ALL about the Bush family, Nixon, and the aftermath. This is why I am angry as hell. Not only at the Bush White House and the conseravtives, but those conspritory theoist who would make up stories in order to increase their ego. JUST LIKE you are doing now, mr Jeff Davis. I am an American citizen and I love this nation, I will not try to spilt this nation up because the majority are NOT agreeing with me or not intune.

George Bush presidency gave me a reason to be pissed off but it was the Barack Obama candidacy that gives me a reason to be hopeful. What do you frightmaster have to offer for this nation? Nothing, but spread half-truths and consrpisy theories. Me, I am in the planning and reserach in order to do something about it.

Lets get one thing clear, Freightmaster. Let me be clear to you. I hate neo-conservatives and neo-confederates. The neo-cons want war with other countries as so as the neoconfederates on eachother and minorites. You are no different.

I said what I said and I mean what said.

You ask what I offer this nation? I am here trying to inform people what their corrupt leaders are doing to this country in the name of freedom!
Invading forign nations ,stealing their resorces,killing their citizens in my name! Looting the treasury, bleeding this economy dry!Killing our soldiers , creating an environment of fear so the American people will go along with their war on terror,when its a proven FACT the US government was behind 9/11! Give me a break buddy with your idiotic statements.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes	Rate This Thread
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode	Rate This Thread:

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Political Forum	Replies	Last Post
Cheney Ordered Iran Nuked?	WiseOne	Conspiracy Theories	18	12.02.2007 01.30 PM
Cheney: US will not let Iran go nuclear	Cybergal	World News & Politics	2	10.21.2007 09.26 PM

Political Ravings Forum - A Forum For Political Junkies
Sponsored Links